{"id":138879,"date":"2016-06-30T10:00:42","date_gmt":"2016-06-30T14:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/?p=138879"},"modified":"2016-06-23T09:15:21","modified_gmt":"2016-06-23T13:15:21","slug":"rachel-on-two-modern-retellings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/?p=138879","title":{"rendered":"Rachel on Two “Modern Retellings”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Eligible\"Done right, book adaptations are one of my favorite things to read. What\u2019s not to love about revisiting favorite characters in a different setting, or with different life experiences, or even just at different ages? Although breathing life into original characters is hard work, tweaking well-loved fictional characters so that the source material\u2019s fandom doesn\u2019t come at you with torches and pitchforks is just as difficult. An author has to expand the established canon without destroying it, upsetting fans, or pushing the story that much outside of what\u2019s expected that it\u2019s no longer really an adaptation. (Hi, Fifty Shades of Grey<\/em>.) Sherlock<\/a><\/em> is one of my favorite shows and Joe Wright\u2019s Pride & Prejudice<\/em><\/a> is one of my favorite films \u2013 which is why I was actually quite excited about reading both A Study in Charlotte<\/em><\/a> and Eligible<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Until I stopped reading Brittany Cavallaro\u2019s YA novel 28% of the way through and reluctantly finished Curtis Sittenfeld\u2019s modern retelling and was like \u00af\\_(\u30c4)_\/\u00af. For both novels, there were too many annoyances that took me out of the story and straight into some variation of \u201cwhy????\u201d For instance, in only a couple of chapters of A Study in Charlotte<\/em>, I already had a list of questions: Why does Jamie Watson suddenly have Hulk level anger fifteen pages into the story? (Because that anger needs to move the plot forward??) Why do Jamie and Charlotte call each other Watson and Sherlock at sixteen years old? (Because we need our main characters to??) Why did Cavallaro set her novel in a boarding school? Why sixteen and not eighteen? Why high school and not college??<\/p>\n

And Eligible<\/em>\u2026 #groan. Why did Sittenfeld change Charles to Chip but keep Fitzwilliam? Why does everyone call Bingley Chip but call Darcy Darcy? Why does William Collins still kiss Lizzy and propose marriage even though they\u2019re step-cousins? (It\u2019s still weird, okay, even if they\u2019re technically not related.) Why does Charlotte move to California to live with<\/em> Collins when they\u2019re practically strangers? (Because Lizzy has to visit someone in order to meet-cute Darcy at Pemberley??) Why is Mrs. Bennet such a homophobic racist and Mr. Bennet such a stick in the mud about single parenthood? Why is Lydia\u2019s marriage such a horrible awful thing???\u00b9<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t consider myself a capital-F fan of Sherlock Holmes, but I am one toward Pride and Prejudice<\/em>. The push and pull relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy is akin to a sacred text. Get it right (I\u2019m looking at you, The Lizzie Bennet Diaries<\/em><\/a>) and I\u2019m in a fangirl puddle over what\u2019s going to happen and are Lizzy and Darcy going to get together and how is everything going to work out??? But get that dance wrong? Change just enough details in the wrong way? Suddenly it\u2019s an affront to all things good and pure.<\/p>\n

\"StudyI understand that both Sherlock Holmes and Pride and Prejudice are in the public domain and so authors can do with it what they will, but, to me, neither A Study in Charlotte<\/em> nor Eligible<\/em> succeeded as a \u201cmodern retelling\u201d of nineteenth- and eighteenth-century novels, respectively. In some instances, Cavallaro and Sittenfeld took the overarching themes of Conan Doyle\u2019s and Austen\u2019s novels and reworked them to make sense in the twenty-teens\u2026 and then, in other instances, they simply rehashed plot points to fit within the narratives even when they didn\u2019t make sense. (For example, why make Charlotte Holmes and Jamie Watson direct ancestors of Holmes and Watson? Why not just make these new iterations the only Holmes and Watson? We already know they\u2019re supposed to be facsimiles. Why not have plot points come naturally to the characters instead of forcing the characters to work around pre-determined plot points?)<\/p>\n

I gave up on A Study in Charlotte<\/em>, but I did power through Eligible<\/em>. With every Pride and Prejudice<\/em> retelling, a familiar reader will basically know in what situation the Bennet sisters will find themselves by the end of the story. But I was wholly underwhelmed with Sittenfeld\u2019s specifics, and my takeaway was: would I have kept giving her novel unlimited chances to get better if it wasn\u2019t a Pride and Prejudice<\/em> retelling? The answer, unfortunately, turned out to be no, no I wouldn\u2019t have.<\/p>\n

\n

\u00b9 SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
\nSittenfeld turns Wickham into Jasper Wick and makes him a total cad toward Lizzy only. The big blowup that spurs Darcy into white-knighting Lydia\u2019s hush-hush marriage deals with her boyfriend Ham\u2019s transgender status. My annoyance came not with Ham being transgender but with how many times Sittenfeld used the word in the span of two pages. After this \u201cbig reveal,\u201d I just wanted the story to move forward. Like, I understand that Ham is trans\u2026but, so what? He loves Lydia and she loves him. They are adults. They can legally get married. Why are you making such a big deal out of this????<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Done right, book adaptations are one of my favorite things to read. What\u2019s not to love about revisiting favorite characters in a different setting, or with different life experiences, or even just at different ages? Although breathing life into original characters is hard work, tweaking well-loved fictional characters so that the source material\u2019s fandom doesn\u2019t…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":138881,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[80],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-rachel-reviews"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Eligible.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6V6sR-A7Z","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=138879"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138879\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":138884,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138879\/revisions\/138884"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/138881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=138879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=138879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danverslibrary.org\/readthis\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=138879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}